What better way to ensure that you get readership for your blog from day one - with streams of incoming links. So go welcome the man who crashed through the door.
David Bullard is consistently spared through style, the saving grace that will allow for otherwise vile or unpalatable expression. It’s the confounding quality of charisma that keeps Robert Mugabe rockin’ and Donald Trump well served with the best life has to offer despite a perennial badhair day of questionable ethics.
We just can’t get enough of the bad boys despite the trail of bushfires and enemy snipers in their wake. Rasputin-like the Bullard has defied the bullet, and comes back unrelenting.
That said it’s probably a whole lot safer to inflame a bunch of bloggers, than those with more than words in their weaponry.
Can’t remember where I read this but seemed apt :
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it’s safer to pick on rich women than biker gangs.
Hahaha! Love the quote about the leather…:-P
The quote is quite apt indeed. :)
But will Bullard’s blog last? :)
odds are the blog isn’t his…
The “leather” quote is –without a doubt– the best quote I’ve seen in a year.
Great site! I’m looking forward to reading!
Yep, google doesn’t care that it’s negative publicity, it’ll still push sundaytime’s pagerank up.
Curse you Bullard from your pulpit on high. I knew I was being taunted but like a stupid bull I charged ahead and left a comment and now I have this silly sword sticking out of my back.
I’d prefer not to think of ‘ol bulldog in either fur or leather, quite frankly!
But at least he has picked on a bunch that have returned fire, and it seems, a group that is gathering support from far and wide - it might get his ratings up, but the longer it goes on, the more ink he’ll have on his face.
I’m sorry, but I’m gonna say it again.
The leather vs. fur quote is excellent :)
Indeed - it is an excellent quote… writing it down.
Unfortunately he has a good point. Also note that he said ‘Most blog sites are the air guitars of journalism’ - not all - so interpret that in any way you like (LOL I assume he excluded his own). Richard Dawkins expressed it better - he said that the blogoshpere is filled with ‘Digital Narcissists’.