<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What makes Genius : Part 4 : Clarity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:48:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daedalus</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-7690</link>
		<dc:creator>Daedalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-7690</guid>
		<description>Max,
Since you are a facebook junky, you should join our group there (Ostendo)... :P

PS: Looooove the picci of the eye...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max,<br />
Since you are a facebook junky, you should join our group there (Ostendo)&#8230; :P</p>
<p>PS: Looooove the picci of the eye&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximillian Kaizen</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-6187</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximillian Kaizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-6187</guid>
		<description>@Andrew : LOLOLOL re: great and mystical Max :-P ROTFL. Thank you for your deeply considered cerebral outpourings matey.. good to see you here!
The subject of complexity is well, complex - but I loved the clarity from Robert Paterson&#039;s post (well worth the read - just click through the link if you haven&#039;t already)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew : LOLOLOL re: great and mystical Max :-P ROTFL. Thank you for your deeply considered cerebral outpourings matey.. good to see you here!<br />
The subject of complexity is well, complex &#8211; but I loved the clarity from Robert Paterson&#8217;s post (well worth the read &#8211; just click through the link if you haven&#8217;t already)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-6105</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-6105</guid>
		<description>Another important aspect of this kind of work is the ability to change your perception of a given idea or thought form matrix.

My own interpretation of complication and complexity is slightly different to your own.  Complication is something that has to first be interpreted and only then understood.  Complexity is an instance of reality that you would ideally adapt to.  Another perceptive comparison of the two would be that complication has to be adapted into bite size chunks before it can be sufficiently well parsed... complexity on the other hand would be defined as a notion that you align and adapt yourSelf to.

What do I know that I can&#039;t prove ?  Many things.  ;-)

The topics of belief and noetic knowledge are both fascinating and wonderful.  I am still undecided as to how important a specific belief is compared to how it is integrated and enacted into one&#039;s own self.  Albeit I may be missing the trees for the forest in thinking that there is really a difference...

I look forward to more of these wild meanderings on the topic of Genius o great and mystical Max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another important aspect of this kind of work is the ability to change your perception of a given idea or thought form matrix.</p>
<p>My own interpretation of complication and complexity is slightly different to your own.  Complication is something that has to first be interpreted and only then understood.  Complexity is an instance of reality that you would ideally adapt to.  Another perceptive comparison of the two would be that complication has to be adapted into bite size chunks before it can be sufficiently well parsed&#8230; complexity on the other hand would be defined as a notion that you align and adapt yourSelf to.</p>
<p>What do I know that I can&#8217;t prove ?  Many things.  ;-)</p>
<p>The topics of belief and noetic knowledge are both fascinating and wonderful.  I am still undecided as to how important a specific belief is compared to how it is integrated and enacted into one&#8217;s own self.  Albeit I may be missing the trees for the forest in thinking that there is really a difference&#8230;</p>
<p>I look forward to more of these wild meanderings on the topic of Genius o great and mystical Max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximillian Kaizen</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-6035</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximillian Kaizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-6035</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you so much for your feedback guys :)&lt;br /&gt;
so &lt;strong&gt;FINALLY&lt;/strong&gt; the fourth in the series! &lt;em&gt;whew&lt;/em&gt; .. I&#039;ve been &lt;em&gt;desperately&lt;/em&gt; hunting the elusive certainty in clarity for myself &amp; when I gave up on the idea out of sheer frustration I realised I could finally write about it with some integrity.&lt;br /&gt;
A certain case of the more we know the more we know we don&#039;t know here.&lt;/p&gt;
Onward to foolish wisdom &amp; not dumbing down your vision just because most people think you&#039;ve lost the plot %-)

&lt;p&gt;Hail to all those who see clearly on the inside!&lt;br /&gt;
oooh if you have time for another quickie read: Erik Weihenmayer is the undoubted icon of inspirational clarity for me .. &lt;a href=&quot;http://maxkaizen.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/you-dont-need-eyes-to-see-you-need-vision/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;go see why&lt;/a&gt; &gt;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for your feedback guys :)<br />
so <strong>FINALLY</strong> the fourth in the series! <em>whew</em> .. I&#8217;ve been <em>desperately</em> hunting the elusive certainty in clarity for myself &#038; when I gave up on the idea out of sheer frustration I realised I could finally write about it with some integrity.<br />
A certain case of the more we know the more we know we don&#8217;t know here.</p>
<p>Onward to foolish wisdom &#038; not dumbing down your vision just because most people think you&#8217;ve lost the plot %-)</p>
<p>Hail to all those who see clearly on the inside!<br />
oooh if you have time for another quickie read: Erik Weihenmayer is the undoubted icon of inspirational clarity for me .. <a href="http://maxkaizen.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/you-dont-need-eyes-to-see-you-need-vision/" rel="nofollow">go see why</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molo</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator>Molo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-5919</guid>
		<description>See it to believe it or Believing it to see it takes a different kind of Genius. That&#039;s almost Hamel &amp; Prahalad meeting Molo Ms. Kaizen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See it to believe it or Believing it to see it takes a different kind of Genius. That&#8217;s almost Hamel &amp; Prahalad meeting Molo Ms. Kaizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Duarte</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-5918</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Duarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-5918</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant! What an insightful opsomming of the current condition. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant! What an insightful opsomming of the current condition. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molo</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-5915</link>
		<dc:creator>Molo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-5915</guid>
		<description>The footnote captions set up are sheer indulgence for me. Not part of the reading, yet allowing for ticklish shout outs while reading, if you want to be tickled that is, otherwise ignore them, consciously!

Hamel &amp; Prahalad had some interesting economical models (strategy as a stretch / fit) which i enjoyed challenging (or downright found &#039;un right&#039;/disagreed to, which a downright genius would not, or would). 

Yet applying the models to personal life made me live by them, although  in a slightly modified way of course... one (a downright genius) could not fully agree with &#039;the great&#039; but one should always &#039;stand on them&#039; right? or stubborn?

Molo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The footnote captions set up are sheer indulgence for me. Not part of the reading, yet allowing for ticklish shout outs while reading, if you want to be tickled that is, otherwise ignore them, consciously!</p>
<p>Hamel &amp; Prahalad had some interesting economical models (strategy as a stretch / fit) which i enjoyed challenging (or downright found &#8216;un right&#8217;/disagreed to, which a downright genius would not, or would). </p>
<p>Yet applying the models to personal life made me live by them, although  in a slightly modified way of course&#8230; one (a downright genius) could not fully agree with &#8216;the great&#8217; but one should always &#8216;stand on them&#8217; right? or stubborn?</p>
<p>Molo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnnaBay21</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-5884</link>
		<dc:creator>AnnaBay21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-5884</guid>
		<description>What makes genius?It is you who makes genius of yourself. Everyone of us is genius, but somewhere deep inside...... and so many people can drill that genius from oneself, but the ones who manage-are generally recognized....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes genius?It is you who makes genius of yourself. Everyone of us is genius, but somewhere deep inside&#8230;&#8230; and so many people can drill that genius from oneself, but the ones who manage-are generally recognized&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genius hunting &#124; Hunter of Genius</title>
		<link>http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-5846</link>
		<dc:creator>genius hunting &#124; Hunter of Genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxkaizen.com/2007/07/12/what-makes-genius-part-4-clarity/#comment-5846</guid>
		<description>[...] Clarity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clarity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
